Athens GA, Atlanta, Baltimore, Chicago, Cleveland, Columbia MO, Columbus, Denver, Des Moines, Duke University, NC, Durham & Chapel Hill, East Lansing, Flagstaff, AZ, Houston, Iowa City, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Lubbock TX, Manhattan KS, Muncie IN, New Orleans, New York City, Oneonta, Pittsburgh, Plattsburgh, Providence, Richmond VA, San Fernando Valley, San Francisco, Twin Cities, West Georgia (University)
Project Partners: Worker Institute at Cornell University and Hollaback!
Researchers: Beth A. Livingston, KC Wagner, Sarah T. Diaz, and Angela Liu
• Street harassment is an under-researched, but likely prevalent experience for many New Yorkers.
• Targets feel violated by all types of street harassment. Anecdotes indicated that emotional reactions to street harassment varied. But, any type of harassment (e.g., verbal, groping, assault) could produce extreme feelings of fear, anger, shame, etc. This indicates that it may be the violation of being harassed, rather than specific behavior that is one of the main drivers of a target’s emotional response.
• Taking action generally has a positive influence on a target’s emotional response to the experience of street harassment. Targets who chose to take action, whether while experiencing street harassment or afterwards (e.g., taking a photo of the harasser, reporting harassment to officials), appeared to experience less negative emotional impact than those who did not. For example, those who responded assertively to their harassers tended to describe emotional responses that were outwardly focused (e.g., anger, surprise). More passive responders described inwardly-focused emotions (e.g., embarrassment, helplessness, fear).
• Bystander presence can have both positive and negative influences on a target’s emotional response to being harassed, depending on actions taken. When a bystander took action by confronting the harasser, the harassment was more likely to cease. Importantly, bystander interventions that had a positive influence on the target could be as simple as a knowing look or a supportive, empathetic statement. In contrast, when bystanders failed to act, their presence tended to compound other negative emotional responses to the experience. Most harassment targets said bystander inaction was highly unacceptable.
• An explanatory model of street harassment informed by our research and current literature is being developed to frame early findings. It will predict when individuals are likely to perceive street harassment and what moderating effects will modify reactions. A preliminary model has been vetted with individuals not involved in the data analysis process; it will be modified after it has been quantitatively tested.